TM Connect

Donate Now
Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Jonah Goldberg on Elizabeth Warren: “What a charming squaw!”

“I sure never dreamed I’d be the warm-up act for President Bill Clinton.” – Elizabeth Warren

THE PROGRESSIVES progressive has a different style. She’s earnest and grounded in purpose. No high-falutin rhetorical arcs for Warren, she speaks softly and carries a big cause that the people hear, because they’re living it.

It’s been a long time since I wanted someone to win a Senate seat as much as I hope Elizabeth Warren prevails.

But to give you an idea of just how fully the right wants to take her down…

Republicans hate with a white hot misogyny against progressives, but particularly liberal females, that is boundless.

Let’s hope Warren’s purpose prevails with the people of Massachusetts.

About Taylor Marsh

Veteran political analyst and author. Former Miss Missouri, Broadway performer, & relationship consultant at the LA Weekly, produced a one-woman show titled "Weeping for JFK."

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

17 Responses to Jonah Goldberg on Elizabeth Warren: “What a charming squaw!”

  1. Jane Austen September 6, 2012 at 11:25 am #

    What an awful comment to make. What is wrong with these kind of men? Are they so afraid of bright intelligent women that they have to make these denigrating comments? Do they hate their wives, their mothers, their daughters that much?

    • Taylor Marsh September 6, 2012 at 11:27 am #

      No, they just hate liberal women whom they cannot control that threaten their paymasters.

      • Jane Austen September 6, 2012 at 11:30 am #

        I guess what they want are “Stepford Wives.” How boring! I just love Elizabeth Warren. She puts her money where her mouth is or should I say her heart is.

      • spincitysd September 6, 2012 at 2:10 pm #

        It is worse than that Taylor, the Reactionaries despise all women. They suffer a “white hot misogyny” that takes no prisoners from any of the fair sex. They target women like Warren because strong females like her show how totally false the Reactionary world view is. Nothing these men can’t stand more than a women who refuses to be crushed underfoot. Nothing wore than a woman who is intelligent, independent, savvy, and not will to take shit from some egomaniacal goober who thinks he should be able to lord it over because he just happens to be male.

  2. PWT September 6, 2012 at 11:26 am #

    It’s not ‘hate’, it’s mockery.

    • spincitysd September 6, 2012 at 2:12 pm #

      No, it is hate pretending to be mockery. If you knew what “squaw” meant, and how offensive the term is, you would understand. But understanding is the least of your concerns.

      • PWT September 6, 2012 at 2:30 pm #

        Yes, I understand how offensive the term is, right up there with nigger kike and chinq. It is mokery, though, because Mrs. Warren is not a Native American, which has been documented, that is why it is mockery.

  3. casualobserver September 6, 2012 at 1:24 pm #

    How ’bout those racist, mofokin’, closet-birther Native Americans….apparently Lizzie Warren has problems beyond conservative pundits in gaining acceptance……..

    “If you are native, there is no doubt, and if one has to research to try and ascertain if they are Native American, I would have great concerns with that and I think naturally I would just wonder if that was a vehicle she would want to use to her benefit,” said Frank LeMere, an American Indian activist of the Nebraska Winnebago Tribe. “If that is the case, shame on her. If she is not an enrolled member, then she shouldn’t represent that she is Native American. Our issues are too important.”

    • spincitysd September 6, 2012 at 2:18 pm #

      Sigh, this canard.

      CO, The question of who qualifies and who does not qualify as “native” is too fraught to go into detail here. It’s a hot mess.

      Besides the whole business is a Red Herring. The critical question here is Warren’s stand on the Banksters and the other Wall Street Robber-barons. Any other considerations are so much chaff brought up to blind people to the central issue of Corporate America and the Corporatization of the Government.

      • PWT September 6, 2012 at 2:34 pm #

        No, it is not a ‘hot mess’. Mrs. Warren can’t prove any Native American heritage. She claims it was ‘family lore’ but the stories that she has related have also been proven to be false. Looking at the situation critically, one might wonder what else she is willing to lie about to get what she wants. Perhpas her stnads against the Banksters is just a vehicle for her to get elected.

        • secularhumanizinevoluter September 6, 2012 at 5:13 pm #

          1.”No, it is not a ‘hot mess’. Mrs. Warren can’t prove any Native American heritage. She claims it was ‘family lore’ but the stories that she has related have also been proven to be false.”

          That is quite simply a lie. How was it “proved” she had no Native American ancestors? Do you have access to a complete family genealogy of her family going back to whenever her ancestors came to America and whether any of them had children with or by Native Americans? NO.

          2″ Looking at the situation critically, one might wonder what else she is willing to lie about to get what she wants. Perhpas her stnads against the Banksters is just a vehicle for her to get elected.”

          BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! This is just to funny to be believed!!! Lyin Ryan and his world record marathon? Mitt da Twit and his invisible tax returns along with his lying and flipping and flopping?

          You just can NOT make this shit(by that I mean your above quote) shit up….you just CAN’T!!!!!

          • PWT September 6, 2012 at 6:42 pm #

            There is an article in the May 15 edition of the Boston Globe where the New England Genealogical Societa claims that there is no evidence that Mrs. Warren is 1/32 Cherokee (in fact her white ancestry particiPated in the March of Tears).

            There is a NY Times article from 8/24/12 indicating that Mr. Romney did pay his taxes (we are still waiting for that mysterious Bain investor to come forward with proof that he didn’t).

            I take those things into account to make an argument against the ever convincing BWAHAHAHA

            Reading is fundamental, by the way

          • secularhumanizinevoluter September 8, 2012 at 7:11 pm #

            1″There is an article in the May 15 edition of the Boston Globe where the New England Genealogical Societa claims that there is no evidence that Mrs. Warren is 1/32 Cherokee (in fact her white ancestry particiPated in the March of Tears).”
            They document every person in Ms. Warrens ancestry?
            And in the Boston Globe from the New England Genalogical Societa…OOPS your bad…Society
            And they DOCUMENT her ancestors PARTICIPATION in the “March of Tears”? What the hell is the :March of Tea….OH!!! You mean the TRAIL OF TEARS….you know you are right…reading IS fundamental…you seem to have just applied the mental aspect!

            2.”There is a NY Times article from 8/24/12 indicating that Mr. Romney did pay his taxes (we are still waiting for that mysterious Bain investor to come forward with proof that he didn’t).”
            Actually it is documented that Mitt da Twit released INCOMPLETE returns and even then the returns he released show him to be a LIAR and if the IRS had the balls to prosecute him a self confessed perjurer…aka FELON!

            3.”I take those things into account to make an argument against the ever convincing BWAHAHAHA”
            Well you needed to do much better then your usual pathetic mistatement of the evidence.

            4.”Reading is fundamental, by the way”
            That’s right, and from the drivel you posted it is a fundamental skill you sadly lack.

  4. secularhumanizinevoluter September 6, 2012 at 5:16 pm #

    Jonah Goldberg whose single claim to fame is having the skank individual who masterminded Linda Trip into getting Monica Lewinsky to keep the seman splattered dress as a mother once again stakes his claim to being just another stupid, racist, repugnantklan/teabagging assmonkey.

    • PWT September 6, 2012 at 6:49 pm #

      By the way, ‘ass monkey’ would see to be a bit of a gay slur. You know, it’s OK because you vote Democrat but otherwise you might be considered a prejudiced PoS.

      • secularhumanizinevoluter September 8, 2012 at 7:01 pm #

        I will be sure to take under advisement your recommendations as to what is and isn’t a “gay slur”, especially when it is in reference to moneys sniffing each others asses to see if anyone is in heat….oh wait a second…that would make them heterosexual wouldn’t it, good to see your record as an imbecilic assmonkey along with the rest of the repugnantklan/teabagging/UBERChristians remains intact!

  5. newdealdem1 September 8, 2012 at 10:29 pm #

    I don’t know who is more loathsome,and , Johah Goldberg or his mommy, http://tinyurl.com/yhfbrp Rotten and infested apple falls close to his rotten and infested mommy tree.

    Jonah and his mommy are the original stuff lurking under rocks, you know those ugly,creepy crawley things, those squiggly things that great people like Elizabeth Warren sheds her righteous and heroic disinfectant on to show them in all of their stentch-gagging and putridness to save us from their white worm lairs.