**CORRECTION APPENDED**

President Barack Obama shows Prime Minister David Cameron of the United Kingdom a bust of Sir Winston Churchill in the private residence of the White House, July 20, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)
The bust still in the White House. In the Residence. Outside the Treaty Room. – Fact Check: The Bust of Winston Churchill
FALSE INFORMATION is once again being floated, this time Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post.
…On the contrary. Obama started his presidency by returning to the British Embassy the bust of Winston Churchill that had graced the Oval Office. [...] – Charles Krauthammer
Let’s hope the picture above of the Churchill bust will lay waste to the unending lies. In today’s climate, I’m not optimistic.
CORRECTION APPENDED: Mr. Krauthammer was correct, Dan Pfeiffer was wrong, and I went back on the pledge I made to myself to stay out of these internecine, hyper-partisan battles and paid the price for doing so. As a recovering partisan, these battles aren’t my beat anymore. However, Mr. Krauthammer’s intent is clearly fallacious. He’s implying Pres. Obama is a disrespectful ally, which is patently untrue. And there was a contract with the British government that did indeed end with Bush’s presidency, which I explained on Twitter, that Obama honored after it expired, returning the bust because of it. But I got it wrong, because there were two busts. The bust Pres. Obama and Prime Minister Cameron are looking at above was given to Pres. Lyndon Johnson and now sits outside the Treaty Room.





What a surprise…Charles Krauthammer one of the absolute vilest, hysterical squealers of the wingnuteshere once again lies through his teeth like a school yard bully/coward….even though his lie is so easily shown to be just that. These people really are pathetic.
Except … he’s also right. Read The Telegraph from 2009: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/4623148/Barack-Obama-sends-bust-of-Winston-Churchill-on-its-way-back-to-Britain.html
And Jake Tapper today: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/07/is-the-churchill-bust-controversy-a-total-bust/
And Dan Pfeiffer had to recant.
I’m not a CK fan. But fair is fair. Pfieffer is wrong. Obama did return it.
Um Beth, look at the caption; July 20,2010. Now go and play in heavy traffic you lying sack of hammers.
Doesn’t anyone understand what “loan” means? The bust was ON LOAN from Britain during the Bush presidency. Besides, who cares about a bust of Churchill anyway?