TM Connect

Donate Now
Use "My TM" for log in & register.

The Keystone Democrats

President Barack Obama walks across the tarmac to greet people after arriving at North Carolina Air National Guard Base in Charlotte, N.C., March 7, 2012. (Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson)


“API supports the Senate approval of Amendment 1537 to authorize the building of the Keystone XL pipeline,” said a press release that landed in reporters’ inboxes at 4:50 p.m., about 30 minutes after the vote. The headline cheered: “Bipartisan Senate majority approves building Keystone XL pipeline.” – Oil industry jumps gun on Keystone vote

Oops. How embarrassing for them that the Senate didn’t approve it.

Pres. Obama lobbied Democrats not to support the amendment to the highway bill that would fast-track the Canada-to-Texas oil pipeline. It was a squeaker, 56-42, with 60 votes needed for passage.

From Politico, here are the Democrats who voted for it:

The 11 Democrats who crossed party lines to support the amendment were Max Baucus of Montana, Mark Begich of Alaska, Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, Kent Conrad of North Dakota, Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Jon Tester of Montana and Jim Webb of Virginia.

About Taylor Marsh

Veteran political analyst and author. Former Miss Missouri, Broadway performer, & relationship consultant at the LA Weekly, produced a one-woman show titled "Weeping for JFK."

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

8 Responses to The Keystone Democrats

  1. jjamele March 9, 2012 at 7:19 am #

    Another reason to never, EVER contribute to the DSCC- any part of that money could go to DINOs like the ones listed above.

    Contribute to Individual candidates, not campaign committees established by the major parties! Joe Manchin, Mary Landrieu etc might as well be Republicans in most cases. We’d be better off without them, so we can start building a real, Progressive Democratic Party.

  2. fairmindedindependent March 9, 2012 at 7:46 am #

    Thats a good numbers of Democrats that voted or this bill. It seems the DINOs will work with the GOP when it comes to oil money.

  3. RAJensen March 9, 2012 at 8:10 am #

    In other news Hell has finally frozen over:

    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/s

    • RAJensen March 9, 2012 at 8:13 am #

      Link didn’t work:

      RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson says marijuana should be legalized and treated like alcohol because the government’s war on drugs has failed.

      The outspoken evangelical Christian and host of “The 700 Club” on the Virginia Beach-based Christian Broadcasting Network he founded said the war on drugs is costing taxpayers billions of dollars. He said people should not be sent to prison for marijuana possession.

      The 81-year-old first became a self-proclaimed “hero of the hippie culture” in 2010 when he called for ending mandatory prison sentences for marijuana possession convictions.

      “I just think it’s shocking how many of these young people wind up in prison and they get turned into hardcore criminals because they had a possession of a very small amount of a controlled substance,” Robertson said on his show March 1. “The whole thing is crazy. We’ve said, `Well, we’re conservatives, we’re tough on crime.’ That’s baloney.”

      Robertson’s support for legalizing pot appeared in a New York Times (http://nyti.ms/zMys8R ) story published Thursday. His spokesman confirmed to The Associated Press that Robertson supports legalization with regulation. Robertson was not made available for an interview.

      “I really believe we should treat marijuana the way we treat beverage alcohol,” Robertson was quoted by the newspaper as saying. “If people can go into a liquor store and buy a bottle of alcohol and drink it at home legally, then why do we say that the use of this other substance is somehow criminal?”

      Robertson said he “absolutely” supports ballot measures in Colorado and Washington state that would allow people older than 21 to possess a small amount of marijuana and allow for commercial pot sales. Both measures, if passed by voters, would place the states at odds with federal law, which bans marijuana use of all kinds.

      While he supports the measures, Robertson said he would not campaign for them and was “not encouraging people to use narcotics in any way, shape or form.”

      “I’m not a crusader,” he said. “I’ve never used marijuana and I don’t intend to, but it’s just one of those things that I think: this war on drugs just hasn’t succeeded.”

      In a statement Thursday, Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, said Robertson’s “clearly stated and well-reasoned comments throw a curve ball into the growing debate over legalizing marijuana.”

      “Defenders of marijuana prohibition … must be wondering if it’s only a matter of time before theirs proves to be a lost cause,” he said.

      Christian advocacy group Focus on the Family opposes legalization for medical or recreational use, Carrie Gordon Earll, the organization’s senior director of government and public policy, said in a statement. The group would not comment specifically on Robertson’s statements.

      Sixteen states and the District of Columbia have legalized the medical use of marijuana. Fourteen states also have some kind of marijuana decriminalization law, which removes or lowers penalties for possession. Legalization, however, would eliminate penalties and pave the way for regulated sales similar to alcohol.

      Robertson’s comments will likely help drive cultural conversations on the issue, said Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

      “Whenever somebody of substance and notoriety in this country … comes out in favor of changing the status quo regarding marijuana, for us and for the reform community, as the kids say, `It is all good,” St. Pierre said.

  4. JoeCHI March 9, 2012 at 8:48 am #

    Just because a Democrat isn’t a progressive, doesn’t mean that person isn’t still a Democrat. FYI.

    • secularhumanizinevoluter March 9, 2012 at 9:58 am #

      No, you’re right. It means they are a Democrat In Name Only…a DINO to our conSERvative readers!

  5. cjoblak@hotmail.com March 9, 2012 at 9:01 am #

    I’m surprised Claire McCaskill voted for it.

  6. Betsy March 9, 2012 at 10:32 pm #

    What surprises me is the vote by Jon Tester. His Governor totally agrees with Obama regarding finishing the study before they give the okay on this.

    The other thing that bothers me is this, why are they even voting on it when it’s the State Dept. that makes the final decision.