TM Connect

Donate Now
Use "My TM" for log in & register.

Sarah Palin, Expert in Bickering, Responds to HBO’s “Game Change”, Ignores Sandra Fluke



This is just too rich.

Sarah Palin whining about GOP bickering, of all things, while SarahPAC has an argument with HBO about their film “Game Change,” which debuts next week.

Sarah Palin’s “advisers” are also complaining about the film.

Meanwhile, there is radio silence from Sarah Palin about what Rush Limbaugh said about private citizen Sandra Fluke.

The first female to benefit from the Hillary Effect, Sarah Palin, reveals that whatever the Palin effect is today it revolves around narcissism and ignoring an issue where a young woman in the private sector speaking out is targeted, smeared and libeled by right-wing Republicans.

You’d think Sarah Palin would relate, considering all the bickering she does about her own narrative.

Where are all the right-wing constitutionalists standing up for Sandra Fluke’s First Amendment rights?

This is a prime example of why the first female president of the United States simply must not be a Republican, at last as they exist today.


This piece has been updated.

About Taylor Marsh

Veteran political analyst and author. Former Miss Missouri, Broadway performer, & relationship consultant at the LA Weekly, produced a one-woman show titled "Weeping for JFK."

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to Sarah Palin, Expert in Bickering, Responds to HBO’s “Game Change”, Ignores Sandra Fluke

  1. Jane Austen March 2, 2012 at 11:54 am #

    Did I miss something during the 2008 election year?  Someone’s playing with the facts here.  I have a totally different impression of what Palin accomplished.  She’s a “quitter” for crying out loud.  That to me says it all.  And why didn’t she let Limbaugh have it?  This is what’s wrong with the woman.  She doesn’t have a sense of what it is like for other women.  The only ones who can make the “ol’ boys’ club” stop their misogynistic comments and behavior are women who at every stroke must call these dinosaurs out when the comments become misogynistic and demeaning, regardless of political persuasion.

     

    • Taylor Marsh March 2, 2012 at 12:01 pm #

      It speaks volume about Sarah Palin’s character, JA, that she remains silent while a private citizen enjoying her First Amendment right is being viciously savaged by a leading voice on the right, while pulling out all the stops to “correct the record” over what people who were there all confirmed happened.

      I write about it in my book, citing what Nicole Wallace has said, who saw it play out first hand.

       

    • fairmindedindependent March 3, 2012 at 6:01 am #

      Well Jane, after Sarah Palin quit her job, she has become a multi-millionare, has been in the public eye ever since, its the time were living in. I agree, since Bachmann got knocked off, Sarah Palin has become the front woman again in the Republican party and she should have also cam out against Rush Limbaugh, but she won’t and neither will other Republican women. The GOP seems afraid of Limbaugh, its hard to believe that a radio host has so much power in one political party.

  2. fangio March 2, 2012 at 1:18 pm #

    There are plenty of women in this country who don’t believe in contraception or birth control and Palin is obviously one of them.  Many of these women most probably agree with drug addled fat boy that women who use either of these two things are sluts because their having sex with no intent to make babies.  Another reason for not voting for a woman just because she’s a woman.

  3. angels81 March 2, 2012 at 2:09 pm #

     

    Sarah Palin is nothing but a first class griffter. She only cares about herself and stuffing her coffers full of money. She’d sell her own kid down the drain for a few lousy bucks and not think twice about it.  For her, politics is just way to enrich herself without having to spend a day making a honest dollar. She’s like every other con artist griffter out there, ripping off gullible people and laughing all the way to the bank.

  4. secularhumanizinevoluter March 2, 2012 at 4:41 pm #

    Sarah?…….Sarah?……Sarah who?