“The programs are secret in the sense that they are classified. They are not secret, in that every member of Congress has been briefed… These are programs that have been authored by large bipartisan majorities repeatedly since 2006… Your duly elected representatives have consistently been informed.” – President Obama
ON FRIDAY, President Obama made a sweeping claim that members of Congress had “consistently been informed” on the NSA secret spying project Prism. It didn’t take long before that was directly challenged.
“I knew about the program because I specifically sought it out,” Merkley said on MSNBC. “It’s not something that’s briefed outside the Intelligence Committee. I had to get special permission to find out about the program. [The Hill]
Same goes for the claim that Prism helped catch Najibullah Zazi, who planned the New York City subway bombing. Marcy Wheeler easily debunked and demolished that canard. That didn’t keep Rep. Mike Rogers from taking to the podium to declare Prism had stopped a, as in one, terrorist attack, referring to Zazi, which Reuters sucked up and spit out.
From other quarters come writers saying the Administration utilizing Prism, both through phone companies and the tech companies, doesn’t really matter, as they dutifully parrot President Obama’s talking points.
Google has responded very precisely to the stories circulating.
First, we have not joined any program that would give the U.S. government—or any other government—direct access to our servers. Indeed, the U.S. government does not have direct access or a “back door” to the information stored in our data centers. We had not heard of a program called PRISM until yesterday.
Mark Zuckerberg has as well.
Facebook is not and has never been part of any program to give the US or any other government direct access to our servers. We have never received a blanket request or court order from any government agency asking for information or metadata in bulk, like the one Verizon reportedly received. And if we did, we would fight it aggressively. We hadn’t even heard of PRISM before yesterday.
Perhaps now’s the time, if you haven’t yet, to meet Thomas Drake. Then understand that it’s not a myth, but actual fact, that President Obama has had prosecuted more national security leaks than all previous Administrations combined.
People are throwing around the word metadata like it means nothing. It has a benign enough sounding pronunciation that belies the power of its collection. From Jane Mayer:
“The public doesn’t understand,” she told me, speaking about so-called metadata. “It’s much more intrusive than content.” She explained that the government can learn immense amounts of proprietary information by studying “who you call, and who they call. If you can track that, you know exactly what is happening—you don’t need the content.”
The Obama administration’s dragnet was made legal through the Patriot Act web. Except what the Administration is doing goes well beyond the Patriot Act, because they’ve gone on a domestic fishing expedition and we’re all caught up in their net.
This is one of the subjects that separates me from the Democratic borg. The libertarian streak in my political philosophy rejects the notion that a commander in chief needs to preemptively invade the privacy of the citizenry before any threat’s been assessed, warned is coming, detected or worth tracking. Being Democratic in political leanings, there is a strong role for government to play in the modern era, but when that role bumps up against personal freedoms for the sake of some phantom terrorist plot where there’s no proof, my libertarian passions are awakened. The Administration’s aggressive tactics have done just that.
I’d say what the Obama administration is doing through Prism is un-American, but in the years of Bush and Obama this type of executive overreach has become very American, with the majority of Congress going along like sheep.