Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

“We met with Hillary Clinton. We did so before the report was finalized. … We believed and we still believe the decision making was made quite well below her level. It was reviewed below her level.” – Thomas Pickering

Issa failed to prove "cover up."

Issa failed to prove “cover up.”

THE REAL loser today was Rep. Darrel Issa and the Republicans, their “cover up” hunt going nowhere. The big name added to the right wing fodder machine was that of Cheryl Mills, who was counselor and chief of staff to former Secretary Clinton. Longtime aide to Clinton Philippe Reines gave a statement on the hearings to NBC News via email, which is below.

The Democrats on the committee systematically took the Republican talking points apart one by one.

Former Ambassador Thomas Pickering, co-chair of the Benghazi review board, speaking with Andrea Mitchell, directly contradicted Issa’s charges that he and others refused to testify, but also once again confirms the tragedy that aircraft could not have reached Benghazi in time.

The only good that came of today’s hearing was once again hearing about the bravery of those on the ground in Benghazi, including those who testified today.

As for the notion of a “cover up,” which is being squealed in 140 character tweets without any proof, Pickering stated bluntly, “all the elements of Pulitzer Prize-winning fiction attached to it.”

The most fact-free tweet of the day goes to Richard Grenell, though it was difficult picking out just one of his tweets, one of which goes like this: “BREAKING: wow! ok, ok, ok, ok, Chery Mills called Hicks??! Hillary coverup!” The guy can’t tell the difference between a behind the scenes counsel and advisor and media hack and political guru Karl Rove? Cheryl Mills inhabits an intelligence universe that Karl Rove couldn’t access with a tutor, a wizard and a lifeline to Dick Cheney.

Steve Clemons, whom I know and trust implicitly where analysis is concerned, even when we disagree, makes the point that there were things said in the hearing that we hadn’t heard before. That is unequivocally true. [You can watch his interview with Mitchell below.]

Where I disagree completely with Steve is his ability to ignore the politics weaving throughout the hearing. It’s understandable to demand more transparency and criticize secrecy, but you cannot do that without also acknowledging the politics woven into the narrative of the Benghazi tragedy. To do so makes your analysis collapse, because by leaving the politics out you’re missing half the story. You can argue that the Obama administration should have been more transparent earlier, which Steve asserts. But when you put it all into the prism of election 2012 even that suggestion falls in on itself. That’s just not how things work, though it’s unfortunate that they don’t.

The politics showed up clearly today when Cheryl Mills was brought up through the testimony of Greg Hicks over a meeting with Rep. Chaffetz.

“I was instructed not to allow the RSO [Regional Security Officer], the acting deputy chief of mission and myself to be personally interviewed by Congressman Chaffetz,” Hicks said.

“So, the people at State told you, don’t talk to the guy who’s coming to investigate?” Jordan pressed.

“Yes, sir,” Hicks replied.

“Have you ever had anyone tell you, don’t talk with the people from Congress coming to find out what took place?” Jordan asked.
“Never,” Hicks said.

Why would you want anyone at the State Department talking to a partisan politician with an agenda on Benghazi?

Rep. Chaffetz is the most partisan pitbull in this storyline, even worse than Rep. Issa, who’s bad enough. Chaffetz does the dirty work behind the scenes, because every time he gets on camera he exposes himself. It would be helpful if you watched his disgraceful performance on “Fox and Friends,” which even they weren’t buying. He’s a gun for the GOP with no intent to do anything but twist information to suit Republican narrative.

Stiff-arming Chaffetz was the only move and reveals why having hyper partisan investigators doesn’t serve anyone.

What reveals how badly it went for Republicans today is how Sean Hannity started his radio show. He went back to pick the bones of Ambassador Susan Rice going on the Sunday shows. We already know that day was a disaster for the Obama administration, so if Hannity’s opening with that on the big day of Issa’s Benghazi hearing their mission was not accomplished.

The email response by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s longtime aide Philippe Reines is below.

It’s hard to answer your question because Greg Hicks didn’t get much in during Congressman Jordan’s “” I guess I’ll call it rant given his decibel level “” but his accusation was entirely out of line and not based on what little Greg said. Jordan clearly went in there intent on yelling “cover up” and he was going to yell it no matter what he heard. He could’ve asked Hicks about his favorite color and Jordan would have blurted out “cover up” in response.

So I’ll address his accusation “” which is completely & utterly false “” by telling you what I remember about that day.
To take a step back, from the moment we learned of the attack in Benghazi, Cheryl Mills did everything she could, round the clock for months on end, right up until our very last day in February, to support our personnel in Tripoli, and keep our 70,000 people worldwide as safe as possible. Anyone who worked around or with her will tell you she gave every bit of herself to the Department. You know half the building, you’ll hear the same. You could throw a dart in the cafeteria and it would likely hit someone who will tell you how much she added to the Department and meant to them personally.

And you know I was attached to her at the hip for most of our last five months at State, and never once did she treat anyone with anything other than respect and complete professionalism. Not even me when I deserved it.

In this instance, I was with her and I remember it vividly because we were hearing from our people in Libya that some at Embassy Tripoli were left unsettled by their interactions with the CODEL “” which was made up of only Jeremy Chaffetz because he refused to allow any minority member to join him (or is it Jason Chaffetz?) “” and the position they felt they were being put in. Which btw, Jeremy/Jason Chaffetz pledged before his trip he wouldn’t do, and that he would completely respect the integrity of the FBI investigation by not interrogating State personnel, who had also just been through hell, were still in a dangerous situation, and lost colleagues and friends “” including their ambassador Chris Stevens who they adored.

State sent a legal advisor as sop to Tripoli so that any personnel on the ground who wanted their advice or presence for any conversation could avail themselves of that option. For their own protection and comfort. Chaffetz refused to let this person on government plane, and resented his being in Tripoli (after he was forced to fly there on his own). And he decided he didn’t want this person around. Which wasn’t his choice to make for the individuals on the ground. If those individuals didn’t feel a need for it, they didn’t have to take it. And nobody was told to keep Chaffetz from speaking with anyone. That’s completely at odds with the cooperative approach the Department has taken with the Congress “” all eight of the committees looking into this “” from day one, until today.

So after hearing these disturbing reports from several people on the ground, Cheryl said she wanted to call Greg herself to find out how the CODEL went (also remember that it was soon after the attack and we were worried that a CODEL, which requires a great deal of embassy support, would tax their resources at a very difficult time), and that we were behind and with them 100%. She wanted them to know that no matter how far away they were from home, they weren’t alone, that the Department was with them, that she was with them, and most importantly, that the Secretary was with them.

I heard Hicks say that nobody senior had ever called him with good news. That’s too bad. But he’d never met Cheryl. That’s who she is, that’s what she does.

I remember it so vividly because in the midst of a very trying time, it was exactly what you’d hope a leader would do at a time like that. To take a moment to talk to the people on the ground, doing the work, trying to do that work under difficult circumstances after a terrible event, making sure they’re ok.

So I’m hoping that if Greg Hicks had been allowed to say more than yes or no and actually elaborated on the conversation, Jordan’s accusation would be revealed to be as specious as it is.

What I do know though is that Tom Pickering, who led the review and interviewed Greg for their report, said as recently as today in some interview that Hicks expressed nothing like what Jordan is alleging.

Philippe

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy