Top Menu

Follow Taylor on Twitter

Michigan House Passes First Piece of ‘Right To Work’ Legislation the Day It is Introduced: Protestors in State Capitol

Yesterday Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder and GOP legislative leaders announcing “fast-track plans to make Michigan the nation’s 24th right-to-work state,” according to the Detroit Free Press. “Fast-track” was clearly meant seriously, as the lame-duck session moved into action immediately.

From Free Press:

Michigan House passes right-to-work legislation after Democrats walk out to protest closed Capitol

The state House passed the first right-to-work bill late (Thursday) afternoon in a 58-52 vote, but the bill can’t move on to the Senate until the next session day – possibly Friday, if a session is scheduled – because of a procedural move by Democrats who are asking that the vote be reconsidered.

The bill – House Bill 4054 – is one of three separate right-to-work bills now in the Legislature that will eventually be consolidated into two bills. The Senate was debating its own version (Thursday) evening. Both the House and Senate bills deal with private sector employees. The third bill, which deals with public sector employees, excluding police and firefighters, also still is winding its way around the Legislature.

According to the Free Press, Gov. Snyder said in the news conference when he made the announcement:

‘The goal isn’t to divide Michigan. It is to bring Michigan together,’ the governor said, as hundreds of union protesters stormed the Capitol and the governor’s office, vociferously voicing their opposition to the plan.

Michigan State Police reportedly told those who had gathered in protest that the building was “at capacity,”

(b)ut as people walked out of the Capitol, no one was let in.

The crowd started yelling ‘Let us in,’ but the police didn’t relent.
Police arrested several protesters and sprayed mace into the crowd when they tried to rush the Senate floor, said Michigan State Police Inspector Gene Adamczyk.

‘When several of the individuals rushed the troopers, they used chemical munitions to disperse the crowd,’ he said. ‘It would be a lot worse if someone gets hurt and I failed to act.’

Gov. Snyder said the bill was about the “freedom to choose,” and “fairness and equity in the workplace.” Police and firefighters, however, are excluded.

State Sen. Gretchen Whitmer, D-East Lansing, said the right-to-work issue was poisoning the environment in Lansing.

‘President Obama won the election and the Republicans lost five seats in the House,’ she said. ‘And still these guys don’t think their agenda is extreme enough.’

Snyder unveiled the plan, surrounded by union workers who said they support the legislation and other business and state leaders … .

Obviously those protesting are not in agreement with the “union workers” who joined Snyder. For example:

‘I am adamantly opposed to this,’ said Wayne County Executive Robert Ficano, who was on his way to Lansing to take part in a rally against the measure. ‘I think it’s a disaster for the state. I think it’s shortsighted and vindictive. The state is going to be in a civil war for the next year.’

(Michigan Gov. Snyder via Michigan.gov)

, , , ,

7 Responses to Michigan House Passes First Piece of ‘Right To Work’ Legislation the Day It is Introduced: Protestors in State Capitol

  1. mjsmith December 7, 2012 at 8:58 am #

    It is about time the People of Michigan stand up to these unions.The economy is in the toilet and unemployment is very high.

    • angels81 December 7, 2012 at 10:01 am #

      That’s right, the economy is in the toilet. Corporate profits at all time high, stock market over 13,000, and wages down. Damn those unions for fighting for their workers to have a decent wage they can live on. How dare workers think they should be able to make a decent wage? Michigan can now be like all those right to work states and make Walmart type wages and be free of those unions.

    • DaGoat December 7, 2012 at 11:04 am #

      I always have mixed feelings on this. Unions are responsible for some of the problems with the auto industry, and some public unions have led to excessive spending in areas where the unions and politicians were essentially in bed with each other. I also think the way Obama handled the GM bankruptcy was a huge gift to unions and reflects the cozy relationship they have with Democrats.

      Having said that, the weakening of the unions is a major factor in worsening income disparity. If shrinking income disparity is a goal then strengthening unions would be a way to do it. So we need to find a way to get the unions “just right” similar to the way we need adequate regulation of Wall Street, allowing them enough freedom to be productive but not enough to screw things up. The political parties seem to take an all-or-nothing approach to unions so I doubt we’ll see a reasonable solution.

  2. ladywalker68 December 7, 2012 at 10:00 am #

    If only these laws would be accurate descriptions of what they really are: The Right of Businesses to Screw Workers.

  3. fangio December 7, 2012 at 10:12 am #

    Guess we’ve come full circle; the state where unions had their first big success in raising the living standards of the working man. Simply unbelievable.

  4. ladywalker68 December 7, 2012 at 10:57 am #

    Another more accurate title: “Forbidding Workers the Right to Organize” law.

  5. TPAZ December 7, 2012 at 1:50 pm #

    Let be find my comfortable pair of walking shoes…

.... a writer is someone who takes the universal whore of language
and turns her into a virgin again.  ~ erica jong