â€œWe got more than what we thought weâ€™d getâ€ â€” Rep. Bart Stupak (via C-SPAN)
AND FOR GOOD REASONS. There’s a dust up over Campbell Brown’s op-ed in the New York Times on Sunday, people coming to Planned Parenthood’s aid because of a blast by Dan Senor’s wife. The Times was wrong not to affix this fact at the bottom of Brown’s piece, because Senor is working for Mr. Romney in a foreign policy position.
Here’a snippet of a piece from Kathleen Geier at Washington Monthly:
The rest of the op ed goes on in this vein. It paints a picture of Planned Parenthood that in no way resembles reality. This is not an organization â€œdriven by blind partisanship, electing to burn bridges instead of building themâ€ or one that â€œsees ideological purity as so paramount that it permeates every aspect of its strategic planning.â€ It is, rather, an organization that does vitally important work in serving womenâ€™s health needs, that is being smeared with vicious lies, that has been under brutal assault for years now, and that is fighting for its life. It makes total sense for them to not support Republicans, because to the extent that the Republican Party, particularly in its current lunatic incarnation, is empowered, Planned Parenthoodâ€™s existential survival is threatened.
Campbell Brown is being called a “concern troll” for taking on Planned Parenthood’s “strategy driven by blind partisanship,” which is exhibited by her progressive detractors taking on her argument against Sen. Susan Collins because of her vote for Justice Alito. Brown also trumpets Rep. Robert Dodd, which Geier of the WM points out was endorsed by Phyllis Schlafly of all people. Geier goes on to make the case that Dodd was also supported the Stupak-Pitts Amendment.
Regardless of these examples, it’s really hard to argue Planned Parenthood isn’t a partisan organization at its core.
Planned Parenthood isn’t in as bad a position as organized labor, but they’ve got the same problem. There really is no excuse for not being amenable to Republicans like Sen. Susan Collins, even given her vote on Alito, because Planned Parenthood is hardly clean on selling out.
Planned Parenthood chose not to blast Democrats and the White House on Obamacare when the Hyde Amendment was codified in that law. That act was made possible through none other than former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who elevated Stupak-Pitts in the House and boasted about doing it, which made Sen. Ben Nelson’s language possible in ACA, which Pres. Obama helped along through in a signing statement on Stupak-Pitts.
â€œI was part of recommending that [Stupak-Pitts Amendment] come to the floor. Both sides are whipping, the pro-choice side and others who want to support the amendment. But no, that was my recommendation to allow a vote on that amendment.â€ – Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Below is what Cecile Richards should have sounded like, instead of what she did (see video below), if she was about protecting women, instead of Pres. Obama and Democrats. From RH Reality Check back in 2010:
Turns out, earlier this week, in this, the (equally hot, politically), but second trimester of the Presidentâ€™s Hyde-redux-and-more, Stupak-evil, though the President said otherwise, (keep reading) Executive Order, it became clear that the White House had instructed Kathleen Sibelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, to avoid any dustups about abortion in her regsâ€™-writing for the healthcare reform bill, no matter the cost to America in the loss of American womenâ€™s lives.
Mr. President: A word to the wise: Better not further jeopardize your standing, when weâ€™re not sure whether the BP cap wonâ€™t go bust. Mr. President: A word to the wise, even if it becomes clear youâ€™ve gone back on your staffâ€™s statements that your Stupak-evil Order doesnâ€™t do anything more than â€œcodifyâ€ existing law. Better to continue to say, albeit falsely, that the Stupak Amendment you once said you wouldnâ€™t abide (either) wouldnâ€™t be a part of anything you do. This abortion matter? Well, itâ€™s just too touchy to do otherwise (even if â€œotherwiseâ€ is the right thing for half of all Americans).
In fact, and as we all know, the Executive Order was nothing but a most willingly made sop to Rep. Stupak. …
Sure, Iâ€™ll negotiate with you ad nauseum, instead of refusing to participate until my demand for equal treatment is met (Barbara Boxer in the Senate). Sure, Iâ€™ll send threatening letters with no force of law or policy (Diana DeGette in the House), in hopes that youâ€™ll do the right thing. Sure, Iâ€™ll support you when you tell me itâ€™s a good idea to (only) â€œcodifyâ€ in an Executive Order something, (The Hyde Amendment), which, by any measure, has been horrible for women for over two generations (The Speaker and her pro-choice Member leaders). Sure, Iâ€™ll believe you when you say that this Executive Order wonâ€™t have any additional force of law in any upcoming circumstance that matters to womenâ€™s health (again, the Speaker and the women Members). Sure, Iâ€™ll believe you, Mr. President–when you sign Mr. Stupakâ€™s evil Order–with no press present and surrounded by the architects of hateful acts against my sisters–when you tell me nothing is amiss.
Cecile Richards and Planned Parenthood did absolutely nothing to fight the codifying of Hyde in the Affordability Care Act. They sat on the sidelines due to the incoming directed at Pres. Obama and Democrats, because they didn’t want to rock their own benefactors’ boat.
Here’s Ezra Klein on what that meant:
Because of the limits placed on the exchanges, most of the participants will have some form of premium credit or affordable subsidy. That means most will be ineligible for abortion coverage. The idea that people are going to go out and purchase separate â€œabortion plansâ€ is both cruel and laughable. If this amendment passes, it will mean that virtually all women with insurance through the exchange who find themselves in the unwanted and unexpected position of needing to terminate a pregnancy will not have coverage for the procedure. Abortion coverage will not be outlawed in this country. It will simply be tiered, reserved for those rich enough to afford insurance themselves or lucky enough to receive from their employers.
Workers and women need strong advocates, but the compromises these organizations make to keep their sugar daddies on board doesn’t benefit their constituents, which is why organizations like Planned Parenthood got sandbagged by Democrats. Cecile Richards was too besotted to realize conservatives against women’s freedoms come in all stripes, including Democratic.
It was Democrats who codified the Hyde Amendment into law through Sen. Ben Nelson’s language, with the help of Planned Parenthood’s silence, adopted from Stupak-Pitts, which hadn’t happened until the Obama administration and the first female Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi allowed it to.
You decide if that is equally heinous compared to Susan Collins voting for Samuel Alito.
There are a lot of abortion advocates on the Republican side, including Catholics, who support Planned Parenthood as well. Where are those allies represented in Congress and how does not encouraging abortion advocate Republicans, the most rare of political species, help women?
Oh, and if you’re wondering where the war on women began, it started when Democrats codified the Hyde Amendment in the Affordability Care Act, while Planned Parenthood stood by silently, because they couldn’t afford to buck their benefactors. Since Stupak-Pitts was elevated through a signing statement by Pres. Obama, which begat the Nelson language that codified the Hyde Amendment into Obamacare, there has been more anti-abortion legislation introduced around the United States than at any time in history.
You won’t hear Planned Parenthood make that case and we all know why.