Top Menu

File This Under Predictable

It comes from Fox and nobody should be surprised.

It won’t help Mitt Romney win the nomination, because he’s having so much trouble explaining himself I’m not sure anything can at this point, but it does give you an idea of the demagoguing on Romney’s wealth.

It also is illustrative for why many Americans are sick of both political parties and their unhinged partisan warfare.

WHO’S GREEDY? Obama Gave 1% to Charity, Romney Gave 15%

I wrote the headline first yesterday: How Many Democratic Millionaires Pay 10% to their Church or Charity? So, needless to say I knew this was coming.

No one can argue that the Swiss bank, Cayman account bingo slick Mitt is playing looks bad. That Newt Gingrich, a rich fat cat lobbyist and access peddler, is teeing off on it is as expected as the Democratic response.

Let’s just not pretend Democrats don’t play the same game.

Mitt Romney is simply the general election whipping boy on wealth in an era of Occupy.

But considering he’s one man among many, including Obama’s chief financial architects, this is quickly and predictably turning into an unseemly spectacle brimming with hubris and hypocrisy.

It’s just one reason the Occupy movement doesn’t want to identify with either Democrats or Republicans.

This post has been updated.

, , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to File This Under Predictable

  1. Marie205 January 25, 2012 at 1:52 pm #

    So, basically they are trying to say Obama is not as kind and charitable like the billionare Mittens. I see, those who give more in charity is better then those who don’t. Look if I was pulling in the tons of cash like Sir Mittens does I would give millions away with out a care too.

    • Ga6thDem January 25, 2012 at 2:38 pm #

      But Obama is worth millions too. It’s not like it’s going to matter that much in the long run but going after charitable giving was stupid.

.... a writer is someone who takes the universal whore of language
and turns her into a virgin again.  ~ erica jong