Top Menu

Middle East Blip

Bush and Sheikh Sattar Abu Risha


Good morning. It’s a study Sunday for me. If you want to join in read
on. What I will ask is that you visit the sites associated with the links. Their insight earns the nod.

Marc Lynch explains
the photo above (other photo):


It’s kind of lost in the shuffle of the coming battle over the various Iraq
reports, but I find myself morbidly fascinated by the photos and reports which
have circulated in the Iraqi press about Bush’s meeting in Anbar with the
controversial head of the Anbar Salvation Council Sattar Abu Risha. The pictures
themselves speak volumes: look at Bush’s shit-eating grin and Abu Risha’s
detached contempt, and figure out which is the supplicant in this scenario.

An hour with Bush was really quite a coup for Sattar Abu Risha. The head
of the Anbar Salvation Council has a rather unsavory reputation as one of
the shadiest figures in the Sunni community, and as recently as June was reportedly
on his way out. As a report in Time described him,

Sheikh Sattar, whose tribe is notorious for highway banditry, is also building
a personal militia, loyal not to the Iraqi government but only to him. Other
tribes — even those who want no truck with terrorists — complain
they are being forced to kowtow to him. Those who refuse risk being branded
as friends of al-Qaeda and tossed in jail, or worse. In Baghdad, government
delight at the Anbar Front’s impact on al-Qaeda is tempered by concern that
the Marines have unwittingly turned Sheikh Sattar into a warlord who will
turn the province into his personal fiefdom.

In June, Abu Risha’s position in the Anbar Salvation Council came under a
fairly intense internal challenge. As the Washington Post reported at the
time,

Ali Hatem Ali Suleiman, 35, a leader of the Dulaim confederation, the largest
tribal organization in Anbar, said that the Anbar Salvation Council would
be dissolved because of growing internal dissatisfaction over its cooperation
with U.S. soldiers and the behavior of the council’s most prominent member,
Abdul Sattar Abu Risha. Suleiman called Abu Risha a “traitor”
who “sells his beliefs, his religion and his people for money.”

That’s our guy. That’s the pillar of America’s Sunni strategy, and a key
player in Fred Kagan’s fantasy life. … ..

Bush
and Abu Risha

Then there is the coming insurgency
strategy in Iraq
. The open letter from the Association of Muslim Scholars
(AMS), which Lynch calls “one of the most influential Sunni organizations
in Iraq” is an eye full and worth a read. Here’s a brief excerpt:


I mention the AMS open letter not only because it’s an important political
move within the Sunni community, and yet another signal of what the nationalist
insurgency groups are trying to do – come together around a political program
and form some kind of leadership which can act effectively in a post-American
Iraq. I also mention it because it’s important right now to emphasize that
these groups are simply not going to sit back and allow the currently America-friendly
tribal shaykhs to dominate Sunni politics. They see what’s happening, and
they are actively strategizing about how to frustrate the American plan to
consolidate an “acceptable”, supposedly pro-US leadership in the
Sunni areas. The Sunni turn against al-Qaeda, and the current willingness
to work with the US military, depended on a tacit agreement between the major
insurgency groups and tribal leaders on the need to defend their turf. But
reading recent insurgency literature makes it painfully clear that these groups
remain committed to an American withdrawal (no matter what the Anbar Awakening
crowd says) but also that they are deeply suspicious of the intentions and
aspirations of those tribal leaders sitting down with Bush. It’s pretty clear
who they think is trying to “illegitimately steal the fruits of the resistance’s
victory”. … ..

AMS
open letter to resistance

Missing Links has some very interesting (I would say important) news out of Saudi Arabia.


Prince Talal bin Abdulaziz, a half-brother of the Saudi king, said in an
AP interview that there should be a political party in Saudi Arabia that includes
reformists now in Saudi jails, and he accused a small group within the royal
family of monopolizing power. Political parties are illegal in Saudi Arabia.
Such criticism from within the Saud family is unheard of in recent times,
and there are signs this reflects an important split within the family.

Al-Quds al-Arabi, editorially a staunch opponent of the Saudi regime, offers
some background in its lead story this morning. The “small group”
that Talal was referring to is the so-called “Sudairi” group, the
core of which are seven sons of Abdulaziz ibn Saud, by the same mother who
belonged to the Sudairi clan, and these include: Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz,
Defence Minister and currently the crown prince; Prince Nayef bin Abdulaziz,
Interior Minister; and Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz. (The famous Prince Bandar
bin Sultan is a son of Prince Sultan the Defence Minister). These three the
Al-Quds writer refers to as the “Sudairi triangle”, and sources
told him that the Prince Talal’s dispute with them reached a point of no return
a couple of months ago when they excluded him from meetings of the family
council. The source said they told Talman this was because he was too often
out of the country, but they also told him it was because of his support for
reforms and for the election of the Shura Council (the appointed group that
is the Saudi version of a legislature). … ..

The
perfect non-storm

The
Saudis and Iraq
:


The Sadrist-oriented news site Nahrainnet.net
publishes a report that dovetails with the reports (see prior post) that a
delegation including Allawi and the Sunni-Arab political-party leaders will
be holding discussions with US government and congressional people in Washington
soon. As far as the visit is concerned, this Nahrainnet report says the group
is going to be touring a number of Western and Arab capitals to gain support,
and Washington will merely be the first stop.

But this report also has a lot to say, citing “diplomatic sources in
Brussels”, about the nature of this tieup between Allawi and the Sunni-Arab
parties. In fact it calls this a “new alliance” which has resulted
from three months of difficult negotitions, centered in Amman, and aided not
only by the CIA but also by Arab intelligence agencies, and the report names
Prince Bandar bin Sultan, head of the Saudi national security agency, and
the head of Jordanian security, as two of the major facilitators.

The “new alliance”, this report says, represents a major achievement
for the Arab regimes, which have been unhappy with Shiite influence in Baghdad,
which they see tantamount to an Iranian threat to the stability of the region.
As far as the actual content of the agreement is concerned, the this report
says:

These diplomatic sources in Brussels say the agreement between Ayad Allawi
and the Sunni Arab political leaders, supported by the regional Arab powers,
especially Saudi Arabia which is putting a lot of stock in this, will represent
a new political axis in Iraq with a weight that has to be taken into account,
particularly since this agreement talks about [concrete and meaningful matters,
including] political apportionment to each of the parties in future, in
the event of success in Parliament or outside of Parliament, and there is
complete agreement on toppling the government of Nuri al-Maliki and on working
to exploit the differences that are raging within the [United Iraqi] Alliance,
and taking advantage of the strong American pressure on the government for
the return of the Baathists to their former positions in the political and
security areas.

And the sources said: This agreement between Allawi and the Sunni Arabs
represents a major political achievement for the regional Arab regimes,
which have a negative attitude to the Shiite influence on the Iraqi government,
which they regard as an extension of Iranian influence, which has come to
represent a threat to Arab national security. …

Allawi-Sunni
tieup: “A major achievement for the regional Arab regimes”

As for the rumors about Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak being dead, Lynch
has the story.

Comments are closed.
.... a writer is someone who takes the universal whore of language
and turns her into a virgin again.  ~ erica jong