Alan Colmes is a Punk

20 January 2007 12:11 am by Taylor Marsh

cross-posted on Huffington Post


Ensconsed in his safe Fox \”News\” channel seat, snugly tucked in as
Hannity\’s hag, Alan Colmes has spoken. The Fairness Doctrine is just not something
we Democrats should support. Must be nice to have all of your bills paid by
TV and radio shows all supported by Fox \”News.\” I smell a rat.

So, with the latest \”Hannity & Colmes\” in the can, the most
recent member to the Lieberman wing of political no man\’s land can return home
to know that his mortgage is paid, his heat and electricity secured, while dealing
a blow against the competitors, which amount to all those progressives battling
for equal time in a world run by conservative corporate conglomerates supporting
only the mouth pieces that tow the big money line.

No rebels allowed.

Alan\’s found his home.

But with corporate security comes the reality that you have to pay The Man
his due. Tag teaming with Hannity while pontificating on the silliness of fairness
is simply all in a day\’s work for Mr. Colmes. With a conservative Democrat from
Tennessee as guest, not even a gun toting southern Democrat will pass, or get a word in edge-wise. Lord
knows the rest of us progressives don\’t have a chance.

The only type of Democrat appreciated on Fox \”News\” TV or radio shows
are good little progressives that don\’t talk back too much. Rowdy Rep. Rangel goes on regularly, but he\’s then mocked and vilified once his back is turned. If you\’re a
Democratic blonde who can suck up to Rush
all the better.

But with his motto secured to the inside of his backside, Colmes\’s knows better
than to rock the boat. Everything he owns depends on it. Oh, except his political
soul, which he sold a long time ago.

Colmes has been on the job for years. Sitting next to Hannity barely offering
a breath of criticism, Mr. Colmes always makes certain to support the star.
In case you didn\’t know, it\’s an old rule in Hollywood. If you\’re the sidekick,
you better support the man or woman who\’s responsible for the ratings or you\’ll
be the next one to go. No upstaging or bucking allowed. But Hannity\’s Colmes didn\’t get where he is by being
uppity. Kissing up is what he does best and since the Fairness Doctrine is the
latest wingnut cause, Mr. Colmes is ready for his close up.

But the Fairness Doctrine isn\’t going to kill Rush or Hannity. With tens of
millions of listeners and a dozen years head start, are they really in jeopardy?
This is about something much bigger. The Fairness Doctrine would bring new competition
to the radio airwaves at all levels all across this country. It wouldn\’t keep
a show on that wasn\’t any good either. But even wingnuts like Rush and Sean
would actually have to offer facts amidst their snide, condescending decent
into propaganda, while having guests on to offer the opposite side. That\’s just
too much work, especially for Rush, who hasn\’t broken a sweat, except when he
was in trouble for allegedly doctor shopping pills, or when he got caught with somebody else\’s penis pills after his single man\’s holiday to an underage capital of the world.

One thing does come to mind, however. After all the lies, you have to wonder
if Republicans could get elected if the public was given two sides to every
tall tale they tell every day on wingnut radio all over this country. They took
us to war on lies while smearing the weapons inspectors that actually knew the
truth, and then re-elected the most incompetent president in U.S. history. Making
sure only their side of the story gets told has paid off. It\’s been that way
on radio for two decades in every corner of this land.

In fact, everything was going along just swimmingly until a man named Keith Olbermann entered the picture and brought the spirit of Edward R. Murrow back to TV, offering comments that blew the collective heads of Fox \”News,\” CNN and every other outlet and their big time stars off of their overpaid political posteriors.

The imbalance in also includes Armed Forces radio. Ed Schultz didn\’t get on until December
2005
, becoming one of the very first Democrats to be given air space to talk to our soldiers. It\’s not
by accident that Democrats have been behind in military support. Between right-wing
radio and Christian broadcasting, aided by the absence of any Democratic voices at all, the military has been fed spoonfuls of suck ass Republican slop for
decades.

So there\’s a reason right-wing hosts are apoplectic about the Fairness Doctrine.
Republicans don\’t want to lose their monopoly of the airwaves and they\’re going
to fight to the death to keep it from happening. Fox \”News\” and Hannity\’s Colmes will be there to help.

It takes more than putting the cost of the Iraq war on your site to make you
a Democrat.

Fighting for equality is part of the progressive package. But I guess Colmes
doesn\’t care what the people are told or what the soldiers hear. If it\’s good
for Hannity, that\’s good enough for Alan.

There are dozens and dozens of progressive hosts that don\’t get a chance
on am/fm radio, because right-wing radio and their corporate sponsors have us
locked out. These hosts also don\’t have the technical prowess, support, network
or clout to have a radio show like mine streaming independently on the web, for lack of a better venue. It costs
money and you (and your spouse) have to be willing to live in the red for months and months and months. That\’s too risky for Alan.
Once on the air, many hosts don\’t get the time needed to build an audience and
ratings either.

But if Rush and Hannity are so sure about their ratings and their listeners,
why don\’t they allow more progressives to compete?

Because if progressives get equal time something else will break out into the open. An American epiphany will dawn that
Rush and Sean et al. have been selling a load of crap to radio audiences for years.
Then free expression will become reality, as right-wing and liberal
hosts hear a rising up of the people because the muzzle has been taken off of the
airwaves. Independent voices will begin to proliferate, giving rise to competition to
us all. That\’s healthy for free speech, not a way to squelch it.

Again, what\’s so scary about fairness, especially if you\’re sure you can win? It\’s only scary to people who now have all the control.

 
Tags:

Comments are closed.

For advertising, contact info@csmads.com
Please donate today

blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you